March 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Blog powered by Typepad
Bookmark and Share

« Privacy and Search Engines like Google: Opinion of Art. 29 Working Party | Main | Energy Market Report »

Comments

Anonymous

Should you really be using the word "proper" to refer to yet another pointless renumbering which (if the treaty comes into force) will lead to the waste of everyone's memory and efforts in remembering which post-2009 article number corresponds to which pre-2009 and which pre-1999 article in order to be able to use the case law (not to mention making court opinion even more pointless wordy as the court feels obliged to mention the various numbers of the relevant articles at different stages of the procedure)?

The comments to this entry are closed.