The Commission recently adopted a new Communication on the "Implementation of Article 260(3) TFEU" (SEC(2010) 1371 final) to take account of the changes to what is now Article 260 TFEU (ex Article 228 EC) made by the Lisbon Treaty.
Article 260 TFEU is the provision that allows the Commission to take a member State to the Court of Justice for failure to respect a Court judgment.
The Lisbon Treaty made two changes to the provision. First, as regards the procedure, the Lisbon Treaty removes the pre-litigation stage of issuing a reasoned opinion. Consequently, since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, if the Commission considers that a member State has not complied with a Court judgment, it has to accomplish only one pre-litigation procedural step, namely the sending of a letter of formal notice requesting the member State to submit its observations. After that, the Commission can refer the matter directly to the Court by virtue of Article 260 §2. That should speed up the procedure, automatically reducing the average duration of the procedure to between eight and 18 months.
The second change is more substantial: the Commission can propose to the Court, even at the stage of the infringement proceedings pursuant to Article 258 (ex Article 226 TEC), that it impose a lump sum or penalty payment in the same judgment which finds that a Member State has failed to fulfill its obligation to notify measures transposing a directive adopted under a legislative procedure. Before that change, the Commission had to obtain a declaratory judgment from the Court first and then apply to the Court a second time to request the imposition of a lump sum and penalty payment.
The purpose of the new Communication is to set out how the Commission will behave in taking those cases to the Court. It makes clear that it it will, principally, ask for the imposition of a periodic penalty payment as it considers that such a penalty is the more appropriate to secure rapid implementation of directives. The Commission states that it will also, depending on the circumstances, seek the imposition of a lump sum. It states that it may revise its practice in the light of member States' behavior and seek the imposition of a lump sum in all cases.
Interestingly, the Commission clarifies that in cases before the Court where it has proposed only a penalty, the Commission will withdraw its action if the member State notifies the transposition measures required to put an end to the infringement. In contrast, in cases pending in which it has also proposed a lump sum, it will not withdraw its action simply because the required notification has been made and will pursue the action until a judgment is obtained.
The Commission's earlier Communication, SEC(2005)1658, sets out how it would apply Article 228 EC but no longer seems available online.
Ths post is good! New Era Hats
Posted by: New Era Hat | December 19, 2010 at 06:23 PM
The Commission's earlier Communication is still avaiable on EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52005SC1658:EN:NOT
Posted by: fredaste | December 20, 2010 at 04:20 AM
Wow, New Era Hats. Shameless self-promotion.
Posted by: JT | December 24, 2010 at 12:37 PM
Pretty! This was a really wonderful article..Thanks once again for the push!
Posted by: Titleist AP2 | December 26, 2010 at 05:07 AM
I came to your article from another article and am really interested in this learning about this. , I feel strongly about information and love learning more on this. If possible, as you gain expertise, It is extremely helpful for me. would you mind updating your blog with more information?
http://www.jerseysonline.co
Posted by: leiqiong | January 05, 2011 at 10:35 PM
I have to say that having been in the court room or having been in a situation wherein we have a debate about the judicial issues, no is above the law. There is always a great opportunity to have read this post and be enlighten by the info it has. Thanks a lot for the effort because it is a rare chance for us to be able to have a clear understanding about the laws in the land.
Posted by: Curtis Johnson Realty | January 10, 2011 at 11:21 PM
You had some nice points here. I done a research on the topic and got most peoples will agree with your blog.
Posted by: headphones | January 19, 2011 at 12:49 AM
Thanks bud. Great blog you got going on here. Have some extra sites to link to which have more stuff like this?
Posted by: iphone cover | January 21, 2011 at 09:36 PM
Thanks for the background on the Lisbon Treaty. It has given me greater insights on the topic.
Posted by: co auto glass | January 26, 2011 at 07:52 AM
Lisbon Treaty is indeed give a me an info about judicial process. Right, no one is above the law. Only the Almighty God will give justice to us. Anyway, you had a great post. Thanks for sharing these. I know lot of people will enlightened about these.
Posted by: iPhone 4 case | February 04, 2011 at 10:01 AM
An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law.
Posted by: Building a House | February 08, 2011 at 08:27 PM
Hope in creating this new article law in here hope this can bring a lot of good benefits in some other way. Hope this will be implemented in a good and abiding way.
Posted by: Die Cuts | February 09, 2011 at 12:51 AM
You have given a very good and a nice information here. The information which you have given is beneficial for me also for others who wants to know this. I liked and very much impressed by this.....
Posted by: Canadian Pharmacy | February 14, 2011 at 05:21 AM
Chloe Handbags affect most women’s feeling. Chloe Bag is catching with soft leather and elegant style. Chloe is a brand of well-deserved reputation and there is no question about it. http://www.discountchloe.com
Posted by: chloe | February 15, 2011 at 11:56 PM
HI,
You have given a very good and a nice information here. The information which you have given is beneficial for me also for others who wants to know this. I liked and very much impressed by this.....
Posted by: CASSY DOUG | February 16, 2011 at 01:36 AM
Thanks bud. Great blog you got going on here.
Posted by: flash drive | February 17, 2011 at 11:41 PM
Thanks a lot for sharing. I hope see you more good articles.
Posted by: iphone 4 accessories | March 01, 2011 at 11:03 PM
you have given is beneficial for me also for others who wants to know this.
Posted by: MLB Hats | March 03, 2011 at 05:43 PM
Years of illnesses, treatment is timely is I learned to learn
Good website information, useful information
Posted by: law online | March 04, 2011 at 11:48 PM
ly very good information. Thanks for sharing this info.
This post is a winner! Love the tips and everything you suggest. Thanks
Posted by: ugg slippers | March 06, 2011 at 06:22 PM
I agree with you, your saying is so good and usful for me. thank you.
Posted by: pen drive | March 06, 2011 at 11:24 PM
Agreed with what you have said and this blog has helped me a lot to better understand legal and judicial issues and its related issues. You are doing a great job and I appreciate your efforts.
Posted by: Dubai Property | March 08, 2011 at 02:42 AM
The Lisbon Treaty made two changes to the provision. First, as regards the procedure,The second change is more substantial.
Posted by: mulberry handbags | March 09, 2011 at 12:32 AM
We provide hospitality consulting services to help developers, investors for their projects. Consulting services rendered during the past 24 years to 84 hotel projects, 41.800 beds in total in Turkiye, Russia, Poland, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Ukraine. Please visit us.
Posted by: wholesale sunglasses | March 10, 2011 at 05:13 PM
You have a very good content in here, thanks, worth the read, anyway I'll be going to be back for more...
Posted by: Vena Pro Review | March 11, 2011 at 07:34 AM