We may have hinted at this before: Bilateral investment treaty litigation is the new, big frontier of EU law.
This arbitral award in the case of Eureko BV v. The Slovak Republic will delight some, worry others.
The story, much abbreviated, goes something like this. The Slovak Republic and the Netherlands had concluded a bilateral investment treaty (BIT) back in 1992 (the Slovak Republic, becoming independent and separated from the Czech Republic in 1993 succeeded to the original BIT). The BIT contained the usual clauses protecting inward investment and a clause providing for arbitration in the event of dispute. Eureko BV, a Dutch corporation providing insurance cover including health insurance, invested heavily in the Slovak Republic when that country liberalized its health insurance market in 2004. But then, in late 2006, a new Slovak government sought to reverse the liberalization of 2004. Eureko claimed that change in policy ruined its investments in the Slovak Republic and began arbitration proceedings against that state in accordance with the arbitration clause in the BIT.
Slovakia claimed, among other things, that the arbitration proceedings should cease as the arbitration Tribunal lacks jurisdiction because the arbitration clause is incompatible with EU law. It claimed that since it had acceded to the EU in 2004, the stipulations of the BIT on capital movements and investment were superseded by the provisions on free movement of capital in the EU and breach the provisions on equal treatment and non-discrimination.
The Arbitration Tribunal decided in its carefully reasoned award of October 26th 2010 to dismiss the objections to its jurisdiction and to continue with an examination of the merits. The Tribunal held that the issues raised by the Slovak Republic concern the merits of the case and no provision of EU law actually prohibits investor-state arbitration.
What is really a cause for concern is the involvement of the European Commission. That institution submitted a brief which, if the Tribunal's description of it (paragraphs 176 to 196 of the award) is anything like accurate, is wildly anti- arbitration. It would seem to be very wrong too. The Commission seems to have claimed that the arbitration clause constitutes discrimination against investors of other nationalities whose nations had not concluded similar BITs with the Slovak Republic (thus ignoring the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-376/03 D v. Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst ECR [2005] I-5821, paragraphs 52 onwards. The Commission also relied heavily on the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-459/03 Commission v. Ireland ECR [2006] I-4635 (the famous "MOX Plant" case, see our post here) but that case concerned disputes between member States and the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice laid down in what is now Article 258 TFEU (ex Article 226 EC) not between investors and States. And if that were not bad enough, the Commission stated it was "firmly opposed to the 'outsourcing' of disputes involving EU law" to tribunals outside the EU courts (see paragraph 184 of the award).
Is the Commission seriously claiming that a choice of jurisdiction clause which selects a court of a non member State would breach EU law if a point of EU law had to be decided in a dispute to be submitted to that court ?
There are considerable inexpensive Fendi Bags available. Just enjoy the super shopping experience on our Fendi Outlet. And the high quality Fendi wallets are perfect presents for friends. http://www.discountfendisale.co.uk/
Posted by: fendi | November 30, 2010 at 07:38 PM
It's funny how we adopt words and adapt our lexicon to the times. This is a very useful slant on things.[url="http://www.jerseysonline.co]NHL Jerseys [/url]
Posted by: NHL Jerseys | December 01, 2010 at 11:21 PM
I gave my site a few examples below. If you appreciate my comments in you enter.Baseball Hats
Posted by: Baseball Hats | December 05, 2010 at 06:00 PM
Maybe, change is a good new life.
Posted by: ghd straighteners | December 05, 2010 at 06:48 PM
Maybe ,change is a good new life.
Posted by: New Era Hat | December 16, 2010 at 07:00 PM
In my opinion the person be given the refund price... Customer's rights should be respected.
Posted by: karen millen dresses | December 16, 2010 at 10:35 PM
I don't see any new legislation being settled anytime soon. I hope I'm wrong, but i have a hunch that's just how it's gonna be.
Posted by: moving company | January 01, 2011 at 07:52 AM
When I read about our almost impenetrable voting procedure I stop wondering why the EU is so unpopular throughout its citizens - it is difficult to understand how we are voting about, and what to say about what we are voting for!
Posted by: Building a house | January 03, 2011 at 08:59 PM
great article. I totally understand this now!
Posted by: iphone cover | January 16, 2011 at 10:11 PM
Chloe Handbags affect most women’s feeling. Chloe Bag is catching with soft leather and elegant style. Chloe is a brand of well-deserved reputation and there is no question about it. http://www.discountchloe.com
Posted by: chloe | February 15, 2011 at 11:56 PM
Anybody who has stood on the prairie in North Dakota has felt the force of the wind and knows that our state has an inexhaustible supply of wind power. The potential here to create jobs and draw millions of dollars in new investment to North Dakota is enormous.
Posted by: Building a House | February 18, 2011 at 08:14 PM
I gave my site a few examples below. If you appreciate my comments in you enter.Baseball Hats
Posted by: Fox Hats | March 03, 2011 at 05:29 PM
It's rattling nice article. Thanks for conversation about it as I am curious in this subject.
Posted by: lucky bamboo | March 04, 2011 at 02:35 AM
yes ,I agreet it Bilateral investment treaty litigation is the new, big frontier of EU law .
Posted by: mulberry handbags | March 09, 2011 at 12:37 AM
Another good article and like other articles, it has also added to my information. I appreciate your efforts.
Posted by: Dubai Property | March 09, 2011 at 10:03 PM
Thanks for the link to the great list!
Posted by: true religion jeans | March 11, 2011 at 12:43 AM
it makes you wonder where people get the idea that short-term planning will yield immediate rewards.
Posted by: wholesale shoes | March 16, 2011 at 06:10 PM
a court of a non member State would breach EU law if a point of EU law had to be http://www.mbtfootwearusa.com/
Posted by: mbt shoes | March 18, 2011 at 02:47 AM
Eureko BV, a Dutch corporation providing insurance cover including health insurance, invested heavily in the Slovak Republic when that country liberalized its health insurance market in 2004. But then, in late 2006, a new Slovak government sought to reverse the liberalization of 2004. Eureko claimed that change in policy ruined its investments in the Slovak Republic and began http://www.mbtfootwearusa.com
Posted by: mbt shoes | March 19, 2011 at 07:25 PM
original article!
Posted by: davao jobs | March 25, 2011 at 08:25 PM
really good reading. http://www.writinginstrumentspen.com/accessories/writing-instruments/montblanc-697.html
Posted by: elsewyoung | March 28, 2011 at 07:32 PM
LiuJiMing have a rational heaven, but "fan sheep" : of course not wake the signs of provinces, "rational" no reason to expect "long-term" silently, rational nature is action, he will go down, carrying critical weapon into the flock to http://www.mbtusafootwear.com/
Posted by: MBT Shoes | March 29, 2011 at 01:43 AM
Wonderful blog! I definitely love how it is straightforward on my eyes and also the details are properly written.
Posted by: true religion jeans | March 30, 2011 at 12:09 AM
It would seem to be very wrong too.
Posted by: vibram five fingers | April 01, 2011 at 09:28 PM
I liked reading this, like your blog layout too. Is it wordpress?
Posted by: microsoft office 2007 | April 01, 2011 at 09:58 PM