The Court held in its judgment of June 11th 2009 in Dubus S.A. v. France (available in French only) that France breached Article 6 § 1 on account of the lack of independence and impartiality of the disciplinary proceedings brought by the French Banking Commission against the applicant, Dubus S.A., a French investment corporation.
A press release in English is available here.
The Court of Human Rights found that there was no clear distinction between the functions of prosecution, investigation and adjudication in the exercise of the judicial power vested in the French Banking Commission. While the combination of investigative and judicial functions was not, in itself, incompatible with the need for impartiality, this was subject to their being no "prejudgment” on the part of the Banking Commission. The Court stated that there was a need for strict controls, to avoid giving the impression that guilt had been established from the very start of the disciplinary proceedings.
The Court of Human Rights also found that Dubus could reasonably believe that it was prosecuted and tried by the same people, and consequently could entertain doubts about the impartiality of the decision of the Banking Commission, which, in its various capacities, had brought disciplinary proceedings against it, notified it of the offences and imposed the penalty.
Interestingly, the Court of Human Rights also held, en passant, that the penalties in the form of fines were penal in character given the high amounts that could, potentially, be imposed.
Why is this significant ?
Because the procedure used by the European Commission in antitrust cases is rather similar (but not identical) to the one applied by the French Banking Commission.
Also, similar arguments are pending before the Court of First Instance in Case T-56/09 Saint Gobain Glass France and Others v. Commission.
Ravon bis?
Posted by: demos | July 30, 2009 at 03:10 AM
This is a total BS, although - without having read the decision - I know it had some basis in (French-originated) ECHR case law. All executive, administrative authorities work the same way all over the world: they review some action and then they issue (or not) a fine. I.e. the investigative and judiciary functions are combined so to speak -- however this is only an optical illusion, as these procedures are always subject to judicial reviews (often two more or even three instances which might even change the decision of the adminsitrative authority not just cassate it). The antitrust review adds a twist (maybe the French banking process as well) i.e. that the authority gives the opportunity for the investigated parties to formally present their case as well. But the investigative, executive authority could always do without this part, it is merely generous. To say that an administrative fine is against due process (when it is in fact subject to comprehensive juducial review) just because the investigation and the issue of fines were done by the same body is ridiculous and shows a very French legal thinking. I have serious doubts as to how strong this precedent will be re EU law. In addition, the ECJ could have expressed doubts about the Comissions's procedure in this respect if it really felt the need.
Posted by: nestor | August 03, 2009 at 04:15 AM
Well, nobody has ever accused France of doing things by the book, have they?
Posted by: Joe | August 06, 2009 at 02:04 PM
Why is anyone surprised at the French.
Posted by: wedding chair covers | August 18, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Haha, like those before me I say 'I'm not surprised at the French'. Competition law seems to be interpreted over there in a very strange way. See the current furore over online gambling - http://www.right2bet.net/community/blog/2009/10/online-gaming-and-betting-french-mps-to-decide-over-viability-of-french-law.php
Posted by: Stefan K | November 02, 2009 at 03:24 AM
whatever our interests, our rights are undeniable and must be enforced in any circumstance
Posted by: propecia online | April 26, 2010 at 04:07 PM
whatever our interests, our rights are undeniable and must be enforced in any circumstance
Posted by: propecia online | April 26, 2010 at 04:07 PM
The Court stated that there was a need for strict controls, to avoid giving the impression that guilt had been established from the very start of the disciplinary proceedings.
Posted by: generic viagra | May 19, 2010 at 10:06 AM
Nice and informational article.Your experience must have been a wonderful one.I can imagine he wonderful experiences in California with all fun of life available there.Nice article.The way things are presented in this article are best and amazing.
Posted by: Generic Viagra Online | June 08, 2010 at 04:37 AM
interesting post! actually, An e-book, as defined by the Oxford Dictionary of English, is "an electronic version of a printed book which can be read on a personal computer or hand-held device designed specifically for this purpose
Posted by: Kamagra Online | June 08, 2010 at 04:42 AM
Well greetings fellas thanks for the opportunity of post a message , also i would like to know more about healthy food is very interesting , how can i get more information about it , I want to sign up for more details.
This isn't even close to being true. Please follow the Raw Data link and look at the Bureau of Labor Statistics Current CES Economic News Release - Employment Situation Summary and you will see that it cannot possibly be correct. Beware you coolaid drinkers, you are taking us all down with you.
Posted by: viagra online | August 18, 2010 at 12:22 PM
Has anyone fallen foul of the French taxman? A friend of mine made a bad mistake, now many years ago, and the French authorities rightfully wanted some money back. They have imposed a fine. They also have put a charge on his house until it is all settled. The problem is that they won't settle it. They will not give a bottom line figure and this has been going on for a decade now. All they do is ask for the same information time after time. Is this not harrassment by a government department and does it in consequence contravene any Human Rights legislation? He wants to sell his house but cannot until it is settled. Any ideas?
Posted by: Old man of the sea | September 08, 2010 at 03:28 AM
I get a lot of knowledge from here. Beside that, your blog is so popular among the searchers from search engines. It means yours is great!
Posted by: gucci belts | September 14, 2010 at 01:44 AM
A few years ago, I designed a calendar project for my daughters. It was a fun project and we thought others might enjoy it too. We decided to use the calendar project to help raise awareness and funds for Scleroderma Research, in honor of my mother who suffers from this autoimmune disease. We raised over $1600!
Posted by: Generic Viagra | September 14, 2010 at 01:56 PM
indeed I was informed in the EP that it is refusing to do so until it has been ratified! There are several different versions
Posted by: new louis vuitton belt | October 03, 2010 at 11:39 PM
The European Court of Human Rights has handed down a significant judgment finding that France is in breach of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights because of the manner in which the French Banking Commission investigated and punished infringements of French banking law.
The Court held in its judgment of June 11th 2009 in Dubus S.A. v. France (available in French only) that France breached Article 6 § 1 on account of the lack of independence and impartiality of the disciplinary proceedings brought by the French Banking Commission against the applicant, Dubus S.A., a French investment corporation.
Posted by: buy jeans | October 14, 2010 at 02:32 AM
Youve got style, class, bravado. I mean it. Please keep it up because without the internet is definitely lacking in intelligence.
Posted by: cheap wholesale clothing | October 25, 2010 at 06:19 AM
I can't believe how much of this I just wasn't aware of. Thank you for bringing more information to this topic for me. I'm truly grateful and really impressed. http://www.taobao-t
rade.com.
Posted by: cheap designer handbags | October 29, 2010 at 03:29 AM
According to the blog, I consider that the Court of Humans rights have to check, the punishment of the people.Indeed a person used,Generic Cialis and was punish unjust.
Posted by: Soft Cialis | October 29, 2010 at 02:07 PM
Greek coalition is doesn't hesitate to spend to allow the Trojan, not because Helen just such a simple reason. http://www.asicsusashoes.com/
Posted by: asics shoes | January 04, 2011 at 06:56 PM
The beauty, Helen was abducted may well be true, but it was likely to be only the Greek coalition against Troy excuses http://www.mbtusasale.com/
Posted by: mbt shoes | January 04, 2011 at 06:56 PM
like the American said Iraq weapons of mass destruction as well. Greek coalition against Troy's fundamental goal is to occupy wealth channel throat. http://www.uggsaleaustralia.com/
Posted by: ugg australia | January 04, 2011 at 06:56 PM
I do want to give action to the European law court for the rights of man on Of russian Of federation.How to me this to make?
Posted by: matiev idris | January 15, 2011 at 02:42 AM
I am simply out of words after reading your blog. I want to appreciate the way you handled such a complicated subject. Nothing better than this could be written in such a simple manner! Hats off dude!!!
Posted by: Generic Viagra | January 24, 2011 at 11:15 PM
The Court of Human Rights also found that Dubus could reasonably believe that it was prosecuted and tried by the same people, and consequently could entertain doubts about the impartiality of the decision of the Banking Commission, which, in its various capacities, had brought disciplinary proceedings against it, notified it of the offences and imposed the penalty.http://www.mbt-usa.com
Posted by: mbt | February 13, 2011 at 01:32 AM